lgs,
What do you mean about splitting the revenue? Do you mean that home/away game revenue is split evenly between the schools? If so, here are my thoughts:
1. The only teams that would travel good in the City League would be Central Catholic, St. Francis, St. John's (probably equal to that of a Napoleon size crowd). Whitmer would also travel okay and perhaps a Rogers/Start team that was doing really well. As for the rest, you are right on.
2. If we have to split the revenue, then wouldn't it work in our benefit the other way around? Example: We travel really well, so 1/2 the money at away games would come back to Fremont?
I don't know, I really don't understand all that stuff, but in my "limited" way of thinking, I'd think it would all even out. The important thing would be to have to keep Sandusky, Findlay and Columbian on our schedule.
What do you mean about splitting the revenue? Do you mean that home/away game revenue is split evenly between the schools? If so, here are my thoughts:
1. The only teams that would travel good in the City League would be Central Catholic, St. Francis, St. John's (probably equal to that of a Napoleon size crowd). Whitmer would also travel okay and perhaps a Rogers/Start team that was doing really well. As for the rest, you are right on.
2. If we have to split the revenue, then wouldn't it work in our benefit the other way around? Example: We travel really well, so 1/2 the money at away games would come back to Fremont?
I don't know, I really don't understand all that stuff, but in my "limited" way of thinking, I'd think it would all even out. The important thing would be to have to keep Sandusky, Findlay and Columbian on our schedule.
